Skip to main content

Selfishness and the Interpreter of Maladies

One of the first things about "The Interpreter of Maladies" that stood out to me was Mrs. Das' character, partly because Mr. Kapasi spends a considerable amount of time analyzing her, but also because of her apparent selfishness and self-centeredness. Between her avid nail-polishing and lack of social participation, she comes across as someone who has little to interest in anything that does not concern her, including her children.

That appears to change when she begins to talk to Mr. Kapasi about his work. She's very interested in his work as an interpreter, which comes as a surprise to both Mr. Kapasi and the reader (or me, at least). Her fascination with his work is extremely sudden, and it's hard not to think that she's more interested in Mr. Kapasi than his work. She makes a concerted effort to include him in discussion, in her family's meal, and in their tour. Throughout this time, the reader and Mr. Kapasi are oblivious of her intentions but curious as well. Unfortunately for Mr. Kapasi, his curiosity leads him to creating a fantasy of an intimate pen-pal relationship with a woman he's just met. Obviously, when the truth behind her interest in Mr. Kapasi is revealed, it's disappointing for him. 

At one level, I think he's disappointed that she has no intentions of creating a lasting bond between the two of them. Her plea for help with her marriage was not what he had expected or hoped to hear, although he was curious about the state of Mr. and Mrs. Das' relationship. I also think that he may have been disappointed in her selfishness - that she had led him on and asked for his company only to use his services as an interpreter. I can imagine Mr. Kapasi feeling as if she had not lived up to her part of the pen-pal arrangement, souring over the fact that she was more concerned with her trivial life rather than the joys and wonders of their future relationship. Regardless of whether he's disappointed or simply shocked by Mrs. Das' sudden spill of heavy information, he doesn't have many comforting (or helpful) things to say, other than "Is it really pain you feel, Mrs. Das, or is it guilt?"

A tough response, for sure, and maybe a bit insensitive, although I don't think it was unanswerable. By refusing to answer and getting out of the car, I think she only proved to Mr. Kapasi that what she wanted was her only concern. She was seeking advice and understanding, and definitely didn't come to him to be questioned. Which, considering the fact that she has held her secret in for eight years and has been lonely and miserable during that time, doesn't seem outrageous. Furthermore, I don't think it's out of the question to consider whether or not Mr. Kapasi is the selfish one in this scenario. He created an entire fantasy about himself and Mrs. Das, to the point to where his dreams became more of an expectation than anything else. Then he has the audacity to be disappointed when his dreams fall through. Is it not a bit unfair to cast such high expectations on a relationship that is less than 24 hours old? Yes, he has been lonely as well, but in getting caught up in his romantic daydreams, he has ignored some very plain realities. 

I argue two things: 1) That Mrs. Das never should've attached herself to Mr. Kapasi in the first place. She was clearly looking for a safe place to dump her emotional trash in, which, while understandable, is unfair to the person she has targeted. A friend, counselor, or family member would have been a more appropriate target. Not a man who she has just met on a vacation tour. 2) I also argue that Mr. Kapasi should have kept himself from projecting his dreams onto Mrs. Das. It's always dangerous to project emotions and expectations onto another person, firstly because they will almost always disappoint, and secondly because it's unfair to that person. Withdrawing his emotions until he knew about her would have saved him both the time and energy it took to invest in her. It would have also allowed him to be a better help to Mrs. Das. 

I think there's some selfishness from both Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi in this story, and furthermore they both seem to be using each other for something. Mrs. Das uses Mr. Kapasi as an emotional wastebasket, and Mr. Kapasi uses Mrs. Das as a figure to fill the social and emotional void he has in his life. It seemed like both of them could use an interpreter for each of their maladies. 

Comments

  1. I agree that Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi both make poor decisions in this story, but can you really blame them for it? Mrs. Das has this horrible turmoil inside of her that probably stirs up every time she looks or thinks about her son, or is just always there and eating her up. She really has nobody in her life that she can go to - you mention talking to family or friends or a counselor, but family and friends are too attached to her life for something she probably feels she needs to keep a secret from everyone, and how would she explain the sudden need to go see a counselor? She was probably just desperate to get rid of the pain she felt, and asking Mr. Kapasi was an act of desperation, not of rational thought. Mr. Kapasi on the other hand doesn't really seem to have anything to look forward to in his life. He has a thankless job and a wife who doesn't really spend time with him. Can you really blame him for using a fantasy like this to get him through his day? Even when a fantasy such as this causes such pain when it is revealed to be impossible, I would once again say considering such a fantasy is an act of desperation for something good to come into his life. I really can't blame either of them for what they do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like that you brought up the idea that both are selfish in this situation. Since the story is told through Mr. Kapasi's perspective, I instinctively aligned myself with him and felt sorry for his emotional void. Now that you mention it, though, I do think that this story is full of selfish characters. For me, Mr. Kapasi isn't selfish so much for thrusting his fantasy onto a woman he just met (I think this is something we all do when we're bored), but instead for how he views others versus how he views himself. He's incredibly quick to make judgments on others and blame them for problems that he is also at fault for (both Mrs. Das and his wife), while not taking the time to introspect and think about how he could better himself and the relationships he has. Like Nathan, I understand both characters but I also think they're both selfish and problematic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Be an Other Man

In "How to Be an Other Woman" from  Self-Help , we saw (are took the role of) a woman enter a relationship with a married man, and learned how to deal with being in this situation. In this story, the narrator directs the  you  to go on a number of dates, to be discreet and careful, to refrain from asking too many questions about his wife, and to try to adopt the qualities that the man likes in his wife. The character that is being directed in this story is a young, healthy, somewhat nerdy woman who works in a disappointing job. She seems unsatisfied with her status before the relationship, and once the affair begins, she feels increasingly uncomfortable with her position. "How" features another young, healthy (and maybe a bit nerdy too) young woman who finds herself stuck in a relationship that is increasingly aggravating to her, mostly because she's grown bored of her partner, but also because it never becomes easy to leave him. Here, instead of the male char

Extended Response to "On the Rainy River"

Here's the original prompt that we were given in class:  Respond directly to O'Brien's questions for the reader near the end of the story: "You're at the bow of a boat on the Rainy River. You're twenty years old, you're scared, and there's a hard squeezing pressure in your chest. What would you do?" How would you answer this? What would you do? Had I been in O'Brien's shoes, I probably would have turned back and headed home, not because of a lack of courage, but because I would not be able to deal with the guilt of having not fought in the war when I had been asked. It certainly wouldn't come from a place of proud nationalism or extreme bravado, rather from the understanding that it would be hard, years later, to see other men who died or fought at my age while I was sitting up somewhere safe and unbothered in Canada. I would feel as if I had cheated life. I also wouldn't see leaving for Canada as an act of courage. Yes, it w

Sexual Promiscuity in "A Perfect Day for Bananafish"

Disclaimer: This is not a "concise critique" by any means, so if you're looking for a short read, this is not the blog post for you. In our discussion of Seymour in "A Perfect Day for Bananafish" this week, several of us had an uncomfortable feeling reading Seymour's interaction with Sybil, the young girl he meets on the beach. The question of whether Seymour was a pedophile or a general "creep" arose, but we left it unanswered. Instead, we (somewhat) concluded that Seymour was more comfortable talking to children, and that his peculiar behavior came from a place of mental instability, not malicious or perverted intention. Furthermore, Mr. Mitchell added that throughout Salinger's stories, Seymour never has a hint of pedophilia or suspicious sexual activity. Even so, he did acknowledge the possibility that Seymour's actions were sexual, and he was aware that students have frequently raised the same questions in recent years. It&#